Has Pruitt Tapped the Brakes on Clean Air Act Section 114 Requests?
Aug 11, 2017
Next to unannounced agency inspections, few things strike fear in an Environmental Manager’s heart like a Clean Air Act Section 114 request. Under Section 114, EPA can compel any person who owns or operates any emission source to provide “assistance” to EPA in achieving its goals under the Clean Air Act. In most cases this means assisting EPA in determining whether the recipient of the 114 request itself is in violation of the Act, which many on the receiving end of the request have described as EPA “fishing expeditions.”
In practical terms, Section 114 requests result in untold hours of environmental staff time scrambling to respond in good faith to EPA’s overwhelming demands. Given the potential liabilities associated with such requests, most facilities spend additional resources hiring legal counsel and consultants to assist with a response strategy.
As Director Pruitt continues to shorten the reins of EPA’s regional offices and centralize decision-making in the agency’s self-described efforts to reduce burdens on businesses, all EPA region requests for information provided for under most environmental statutes, including CAA Section 114 requests, must now be reviewed and approved by EPA Headquarters. As news of this policy was first reported by Politico in its daily energy and environment roundup on July 17, EPA expressed to the journal that it “is working to…eliminate overly broad and unduly burdensome requests for information. These changes will enable the agency to efficiently and consistently gather the information it needs to assure compliance with environmental laws.”
Historically, EPA regional offices have had largely unfettered enforcement autonomy and relied heavily on Section 114 requests as a discovery tool. EPA’s new information request aggregation policy may just very well reduce the number and complexity of these requests.
- Has Pruitt Tapped the Brakes on Clean Air Act Section 114 Requests?
- NSR Law Blog - OAQPS: Appendix W Section 8 updates
- EPA and Army Corps publish the long awaited proposed WOTUS rule
- NSR Law Blog - Draft EPA National Program Managers Guidance Suggests Focus on Monitoring and Timely
- NSR Law Blog - State NSR Program Approval Roundup: May 1 through July 5, 2017
- Region 9 updates
- EPA’s new Hazardous Waste Generator Improvements rule - effective as of May 30, 2017.
- NSR Law Blog - EAB Reject Requirement for Digital Camera Optical Technology
- NSRLaw Blog - Exploring the Ameren PSD decision
- NSRLaw Blog - PM2.5 Implementation Rule Changes NNSR Permit Requirements
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Delays 30 Rules - Including Appendix W Modeling Update
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Updates PSD Permit Appeal Rules
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Issues Direct Final Rule to Allow Rescission of Step 2 PSD Permits
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Announces “Next Steps” for Step 2 PSD Permits After UARG
- NSR Law Blog - EPA “No Action Assurance” for Step 2 PSD Permit GHG Conditions
- NSR Law Blog is active!
- Doug Jorden - 2017 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America, 2016 List of Southwest Super Lawyers
- Eric Hiser - 2017 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America
- Welcome to Jorden Hiser & Joy
- Eric Hiser - 2016 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America