Fourth Circuit Narrows Permit Shield for General NPDES Permits under Clean Water Act
Jul 25, 2014
On July 11, 2014, the Fourth Circuit in Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards, et al. v. A&G Coal Corporation narrowed the shield that protects NPDES permit holders from liability for discharges under the Clean Water Act. The court held that the shield did not protect the permit holders from liability for discharges of pollutants not specifically listed in their general permit.
In A&G, the permit holder, A&G Coal Corporation, had unpermitted concentrations of selenium in its discharge. A&G’s permit did not identify selenium, and A&G did not disclose that selenium may be present in the discharge. A&G argued, however, that, because it was not aware of the presence of selenium, it was not obligated to disclose it. Further, it contended that, because the permitting authority was aware that selenium had been present in similar, nearby operations, it had “reasonably contemplated” the possibility of selenium in the company’s discharge. The lower court rejected the argument, finding that the shield did not apply because the permit did not identify selenium and the company did not disclose its potential presence.
On appeal, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit upheld the lower court’s ruling, rejected A&G’s contention that it was not obligated to disclose selenium, and held A&G liable for failing to properly test for and document the presence of selenium in its permit application. The Court explained that if it were to accept A&G’s contention, it would assign a “passive role” to permit applicants, encourage “willful blindness,” and “tear a large hole in the [Clean Water Act], whose purpose it is to protect the waters of Appalachia and the nation and their healthfulness, wildlife, and natural beauty.”
The Sixth Circuit, in Sierra Club v. ICG Hazard, and the Ninth Circuit, in Alaska Community Action on Toxics, et al., v. Aurror Energy Services, LLC, et al. are also set to determine whether the permit shield protects releases not explicitly enumerated in a general permit.
- Has Pruitt Tapped the Brakes on Clean Air Act Section 114 Requests?
- NSR Law Blog - OAQPS: Appendix W Section 8 updates
- EPA and Army Corps publish the long awaited proposed WOTUS rule
- NSR Law Blog - Draft EPA National Program Managers Guidance Suggests Focus on Monitoring and Timely
- NSR Law Blog - State NSR Program Approval Roundup: May 1 through July 5, 2017
- Region 9 updates
- EPA’s new Hazardous Waste Generator Improvements rule - effective as of May 30, 2017.
- NSR Law Blog - EAB Reject Requirement for Digital Camera Optical Technology
- NSRLaw Blog - Exploring the Ameren PSD decision
- NSRLaw Blog - PM2.5 Implementation Rule Changes NNSR Permit Requirements
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Delays 30 Rules - Including Appendix W Modeling Update
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Updates PSD Permit Appeal Rules
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Issues Direct Final Rule to Allow Rescission of Step 2 PSD Permits
- NSR Law Blog - EPA Announces “Next Steps” for Step 2 PSD Permits After UARG
- NSR Law Blog - EPA “No Action Assurance” for Step 2 PSD Permit GHG Conditions
- NSR Law Blog is active!
- Doug Jorden - 2017 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America, 2016 List of Southwest Super Lawyers
- Eric Hiser - 2017 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America
- Welcome to Jorden Hiser & Joy
- Eric Hiser - 2016 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America